Showing posts with label marriage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marriage. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Beware of John Wilkins

Greetings.

Jewish date:  17 Siwan 5769.

Worthy cause of the day:  “Strengthen the clean energy bill”.

Relevant to Divine Misconceptions:
  1. Strange, but historically precedented, form of religious oppression:  “Pakistan: Muslim Forces 12-Year-Old Girl To Convert, Marry Him”.  Please note the persistent lying and excuse-making on the part of the Muslims in this drama, including the demand that the Christian mother work for a year for the kidnapper in order to get her daughter back.
  2. More countries acting shamefully with regard to freedom of religion:  “AZERBAIJAN: Repressive new Religion Law and new punishments enter into force”, “Catholic convent demolished in Vietnam”, “RUSSIA: Widespread protests at new 'Inquisition'”
  3. “Vatican visits CERN's Big Bang machine”:  Despite some worrisome behavior on the part of the current pope, Roman Catholic Church still seems to adhere to Pope John Paul II’s pro-science belief that “truth cannot contradict truth”.  Such an attitude is very sensible.  If there is a creator god, then that god is responsible directly for the laws of physics and indirectly for everything that is a consequence of those laws.  As such, the results of quality scientific research may thus be said to emanate from the Divine Will and thus not to be lightly dismissed.
Today’s news and commentary:
Today’s weird thing is “The Analytical Language of John Wilkins” by celebrated weird author Jorge Luis Borges.  Enjoy and share the weirdness.

Aaron

Thursday, June 4, 2009

Beware of the man in the steel mask

Greetings.

Jewish date:  12 Siwan 5769.

Today’s holiday:  Thursday of the Ninth Week of Ordinary Time.

Today’s quasi-holidays:  Clean Air Day, International Day of Innocent Children Victims of Aggression.

Worthy cause of the day:  “Support the U.S.'s Decision to Join the UN Human Rights Council” and “Put a People-Powered Internet First”.

Relevant to Divine Misconceptions:
  1. “Drought-hit India's frog wedding”:  I could have easily made this today’s weird thing, because I have no clue why a Hindu rain god would be appeased by a wedding for two frogs.  Then again, arguably what any god wants is somewhat arbitrary.  A real deity (one not of our universe) would have no physical need for anything we could provide.  As such, anything a real deity would find meritorious would have to fall into other categories, such as wisdom, inculcation of proper behavior, or beauty.  Intuition suggests that the last alternative, that the rain god is supposed to enjoy frogs getting married, is the most likely.  (Any Hindu or otherwise properly knowledgeable person reading this, please let me know if I am wrong.)
  2. Some countries never learn anything about freedom of religion:  “KYRGYZSTAN: Crackdown follows new Religion Law”.
  3. “US cancer teen 'to get treatment'”:  Just in case you did not hear about this on the news.  Daniel Hauser, the boy with Hodgkin’s lymphoma who turned down chemotherapy for religious reasons, and his mother are no longer on the run.  Daniel is now getting proper treatment.
Today’s news and commentary:
Today’s weird thing was provided for me by a masked man with a machine gun and included below.  Enjoy and share the weirdness.

Aaron



From:  James McCullen XXIV, Military Arms Research Syndicate
To:  Everyone
To whom it may concern:
Once again my good name is being defamed, and I am getting pretty tired of it.  Yes, I know, every public figure must endure some kind of insults and derision, but this is really too much.  Instead of new action figures or a cartoon series, it’s an all-new movie, and I am once again being portrayed as the villain.
G. I. Joe:  The Rise of Cobra, what a tacky name.  That’s a mere step above that of another upcoming and probably equally insipid film, Transformers:  Revenge of the Fallen.  They might as well chosen something more fitting such as Lapses of Sense and Things Blowing Up.  That’s the level this thing will be at if the trailer tells right.  Let me give you an overview based on the bloody thing.
Myself, played by Christopher Eccleston (brilliant in Doctor Who but doesn’t look or sound a thing like me) looks a bit peeved as I say “When I’m finished, this world will never forget,” and then things happen.  There are lapses of sense and things blowing up.  Some sort of fictitious acid eats away the whole Eiffel Tower.  Things blow up.  Sienna Miller, playing my wife Anastasia, keeps appearing as things blow up.  A bunch of people assemble to deal with the threat of Sienna Miller and things blowing up.  They have special “accelerator suits” which turn them into superheroes.  And so the battle begins to save something or other.
I can’t understate how much of a nutter whoever made this piece of tripe is.  Forget the acid and the accelerator suits.  The personal attacks are really too much.  I am an honest business men, nothing more, certainly not a terrorist.  And my wife, she does not go running about wearing a skin-tight leather jumpsuit in public.  Though not in the trailer, I don’t look forward to the inevitable shot of Christopher Eccleston in a steel mask.  These are things which are odd and improper and we simply do not go out wearing.  As for what we do in the privacy of our own home, that is no one else’s business.  The smears against us have been very trying on our family, and I do not care for what this will do to our grandchildren.  The past few decades have been very trying with children and grandchildren asking for everything from rides on giant larvae to help in creating a new headmaster in school from the DNA of much better tutors.  Enough is enough.
There is also the larger issue of the depiction of terrorism.  On neither side of the pond does anyone with the least involvement in politics seem to have the slightest understanding of terrorists. and whay they do what they do.  Here in Britain they seem happy to appease the unfriendlies and let them into our country.  America is no better.  You have the Republicans (Fascists) who are either simplistically for or against something, quite willing to bomb anyone who is currently against them and send the children of the poor in to die so long as they get rich off the whole affair.  They’re willing to overlook any atrocities so long as they are done by someone on their side.  And then you have the Democrats (Socialists), who would rather talk things over and assume everyone else is rational and wants peace no matter how obviously crazy they are.  They’re also willing to overlook any atrocities so long as they are done by someone on their side.  To the Socialists, the issue is always about economics or some kind of misunderstanding, while the Fascists always say the terrorists hate freedom and liberty (even through the Fascists themselves are great enemies of freedom of liberty).
Poppycock.
Let us take the very real terrorist organization that is Cobra.  They are not “haters of freedom and liberty” any more than the Fascists.  Actually they very much enjoy it, at least so far as it serves them.  Like the Fascists, they completely oppose it for anyone who opposes them, of course.  Simply treating them as “bad guys” never deals with what about them makes them “bad.”  Yes, they kill people, but so the soldiers of the so-called free world.  Indeed, killing Cobra soldiers is often followed by others joining Cobra and going out to kill people themselves, “radicalizing” it’s called.  Nor do they really want peace or a particular piece of territory or anything like that.  Of course, they say they do, but once they get these things, are they ever satisfied?  Certainly not.  They walk away from treaties or simply ignore them and go right back to exactly what they were doing.
What no one seems to understand is that Cobra is not merely a terrorist organization, but a religious one as well.  They have definite beliefs about their place in the universe and how everyone else fits into it.  People outside of Cobra are not merely inferior, but subhuman, they same way European-Americans used to regard their African slaves.  By dominating these subhumans, the Cobraists do their religious duty and receive their eternal reward.  It is madness, of course, but more shocking still is the madness of those dealing with them.
Citing any religious reason for terrorism is politically incorrect.  The Fascists themselves make religious appeals and don’t want to portray religion as a bad thing.  The Socialists try to acknowledge and value everyone’s differences, holding them as all equally valid, no matter how hateful, offensive, or backwards they are.  And so no one will acknowledge what should be obvious, and no one does anything to address the real problem.  Indeed, they encourage those who have to deal with Cobra firsthand to try to compromise, make deals, or otherwise commit suicide.
No one with any sense tries to compromise with someone with no respect for you.  You don’t ask for a timeout from the madman with a butcher knife or make nice with your rapist.  All the free world has gained from this approach is making itself look weak and stupid, because it is weak and stupid.  Is it any wonder that Cobra keeps coming back, spilling blood, blowing things up, all the while blaming the free world for its actions?  You bloody imbeciles, by not dealing with Cobra as it really is, you‘re damn right you are responsible.
True enough, I am a weapons dealer, and I sell quite happily to Cobra.  I sell to you as well, anyone really.  As I’ve said, you’re all quite mad, so there really is no difference.  I can’t change you, and you’re all going to blow each other up in the end, so why fight it?  You want to make each other dead for stupid reasons, fine with me, it’s not like world gives one whit about anything they say is really important.  I’m just going to sit back, and if things get really bad, I got myself one nice cozy bunker to wait it out.  Enjoy.
Let’s see you address that in your stupid movie.

Tuesday, June 2, 2009

Beware of Captain Kirk

Greetings.

Jewish date:  10 Siwan 5769.

Today’s holidays:

Today’s quasi-holidays:

Worthy cause of the day: “Silence Is The Enemy” (with some detail of the problem in “After Wars, Mass Rapes Persist”), “224,900% increase in Solar Energy by 2020?”, and “Support Health Research That Fuels Hope”.

Relevant to Divine Misconceptions:
  1. “Scientology CEO Outraged About Wikipedia ”:  This is a delusional rant from the Church of Scientology’s CEO David Miscavige, who is very upset that Wikipedia will not allow Scientologists to edit articles about themselves to show them only in a positive light.  The level of paranoia should be an indication that Mr. Miscavige is probably not the right person to be editing anything in a public forum.  E.g.:

    "The goal of Scientology is a sane world, without criminals, without psychiatric terror, without war. Ultimately, the goal of Scientology is sanity itself. Only the insane would attempt to stop Scientology. With this brutal decision, not only is Wikipedia criminally attacking the world's most ethical people, members of the Scientology religion, but it is preventing Scientologists from presenting our religion in the most positive and truthful light. There is so much nonsense on the internet about Scientology, all of which was written by anti-religion extremists in the employ of the Psychiatric-Pharmaceutical industry. Many are also being paid by certain depraved, degenerate factions within the German government. You can't believe any of it. If these scumbags had their way, all children would be psych-drugged into oblivion, most eventually becoming high school gunmen; vicious de-programmers would constantly be leaping out from shadowy corners; there would be all-night electroshock parlors on the high street of every village, town and city; and anyone who tried to live an ethical life would quickly receive an icepick lobotomy. This is why it is necessary for Scientologists to try to present a balanced perspective, by showcasing all the good things about the Scientology religion, and removing all the lies."
    Please note the delusion that Scientology is ethical (which is only true if one assumes that the people in charge of the religion are better than everyone else and are entitled to exploit everyone else, including their own membership), the delusion that Scientologists should have a monopoly on how Scientology is depicted (freedom of speech violation), the delusion that everyone speaking up against anti-Scientology on the Internet is an “anti-religion extremist” working for psychiatrists and drug companies and the German government, and the delusion that the Church of Scientology is the only thing preventing the planet from going to Hell.  My favorite line in the whole rant is:

    As members of a minority religion, Scientologists deserve to be treated fairly, which means that we should be allowed to do things that other groups may not do.
    This, of course, is the opposite of what “fairly” actually means.  Thank you, Mr. Miscavige, for giving the good folks of Anonymous a very easy target.
  2. Considering the bad behavior that Mr. Miscavige and other Scientologists try to cover up, stories like this one should be no surprise:  “Norwegian government considers prosecuting Scientology”.
  3. “We’re not rebels, Catholic splinter group says”:  Here we have in Kenya a breakaway group from the Roman Catholic Church, not following all the rules of the Roman Catholic Church, but demanding recognition and respect from the Roman Catholic Church.  This is a group under the delusion that acceptance is a right, not a privilege.  Bad idea.
  4. “Would Jesus oppose gays and be silent on porn?”:  Rabbi Boteach is right; there is a lot more to Christianity than just opposition to homosexuality.  If Christians really want to save heterosexual marriage, they have to do something which helps marriages in trouble rather than attack people who are not part of the problem.  The fact that there is more to Christianity than opposition to homosexual marriages is rightly recognized by Christians themselves in “Standstill Continues at Liberty University Over Ouster of College Democrats”.
Today’s news and commentary:
Today’s weird thing is Punch Captain Kirk, which was recommended (or at least noted as weird) by William Shatner himself in his book Get a Life.  I suspect the person who created this pointless exercise was more of a Captain Picard fan.  Enjoy, share the weirdness, and don’t be too hard on Captain Kirk.

Aaron

Friday, May 15, 2009

Beware of fancy iPods

Greetings.

Jewish date: 21 ’Iyyar 5769.

Today’s holidays: Day 36 of the ‘Omer.

Today’s quasi-holidays: National Chocolate Chip Day, National Receptionists Day, Straw Hat Day, International Day of Families.

Worthy causes of the day: “Fighting Cancer Requires Health Care Reform”, “Tell President Obama: Keep your promise to repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell."”, and “Don't let the banks water down credit card reform”.

Relevant to Divine Misconceptions:
  1. Interesting tactics: “Online Confessions Rising In Popularity” and “Church wants Jesus in jeans statue to connect with community”.
  2. Rabbi Shmuley says Miss California’s real issue is posing topless rather then opposing gay marriage”: He has a point. Christian values go beyond just opposing homosexuals marrying each other.
  3. Dishonest tactics:  “The myth of a secular Palestine” and “Islamism's Campus Club: The Muslim Students' Association”.
Today’s news and commentary:
Today’s weird thing is “Classy Mini Mod”.  Enjoy and share the weirdness.

Aaron

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

Beware of old computers

Greetings.

Jewish date:  28 Nisan 5769.

Today’s holidays:  Day 13 of the ‘Omer.

Today’s quasi-holidays:  Earth Day.

Relevant to Divine Misconceptions:
  1. “Friday Project plans atheist Christmas”:  I think the absurdity of atheists trying to co-opt a religious holiday, even humorously, speaks for itself.
  2. A plea for sanity, tolerance, and not panicking:  “The same-sex marriage question:  Gay marriage: religious or secular institution?
Today’s news and commentary:
Today’s weird thing is “Queen Bohemian Rhapsody Old School Computer Remix”:

Enjoy and share the weirdness.

Aaron

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Thursday, November 20, 2008

22 Marḥeshwan 5769: Name Your PC Day/Africa Industrialization Day/Universal Children’s Day

Greetings.

Worthy causes of the day: “Repower, Refuel, and Rebuild America”, “Stop Bush's Dangerous Changes to Endangered Species Act!”, “Insist on Environmental Review Before Utah Drilling Lease Auction”, and “DELAYS ARE KILLING DARFUR”.

Relevant to Divine Misconceptions:
  1. I am feeling very annoyed. It seems that whenever there is a successful religious work, especially something purporting to be scripture, there will inevitably be something that will claim to be that work’s successor. One consequence of this is just as the New Testament claims to be a successor of the Hebrew Bible, there are works which claim to be the successor to the New Testament. Some of these, such as the Qur’an and Book of Mormon, are well popularized and distinctively named. However, there are at least 19 works out there purporting in some way or another to be the Third Testament:
    1. A Third Testament: A Modern Pilgrim Explores the Spiritual Wanderings of Augustine, Blake, Pascal, Tolstoy, Bonhoeffer, Kierkegaard, and Dostoevsky by Malcolm Muggeridge (does not appear to be a true Third Testament)
    2. Awake: The Third Testament by Russell Hamner
    3. The Third Testament by Curtis J. Scott (may be fiction)
    4. The Third Testament by Julian North
    5. The Third Testament-Spirit of Truth: The Forerunner, The Guardian, The Book of True Life, Message from Mary by T. R. Ross
    6. The Third Testament, Volume 1 by X. Dorison and A. Alice (fiction)
      The writings of Emanuel Swedenborg, also known as The Writings or The Third Testament
    7. Third Testament by Thomas A. Rees
    8. The Third Testament by Scribe
    9. The Third Testament by Martinus (multiple volumes)
    10. The Prophet and the Maid: The Third Testament by Allen F. Whitener (seems to be fiction)
    11. The Third Testament by Faye Wolff Allen
    12. Man’s place in the universe: The third testament by Isaac Harris
    13. The Third Testament: Three Gospels of Peace by Ron Whitehead
    14. The Third Testament: A Story of Regeneration by Dr. Catherine Macklin Thomas
    15. The third testament: A message of power, goodness and conquest for the people of today by N. Ellsworth Escott
    16. The Third Testament the Ilect Verses of Jah Rastafari by Haile Sellassie I
    17. The Third Testament, or the Apocalypse: a Brief Exposition by Geo Burnett
    18. The third testament of the Holy Bible by S. Joseph Iannarelli
    19. Divine Looking Glass or The Third and Last Testament of Our Lord Jesus Christ by John Reeve
    Yes, a few of these are fiction. But many seem to be serious religious works. Please do not ask me about the basis for any of these works claiming to be the Third Testament. I know that Swedenborg and Martinus were mystics and that Halle Sellassie I was emperor of Ethiopia, but I know very little about any of the authors or their religious lives. What I am disturbed about is that they all chose the same name for their works, as if none of them could do a little research to see if the name “Third Testament” had already been used. (I am under the impression that Swedenborg may have the rights to the name, but I am far from certain.) This is just asking for confusion, not to mention indicating a severe lack of creativity. In an expression of my disapproval, I hereby preemptively lay claim to all names of the form “The nth Testament” for every n which does not equal 1, 2, or 3. On top of this, I have a bad feeling that the first book of Divine Misconceptions will end up being titled The Zeroth Testament, as being able to think is such a basic skill that revelation is practically worthless without it. (My other “bad feeling” titles are The Orange Catholic Bible and Not Another Bible.)
  2. “Hollywood out of step with American morals: poll”: The people of the United States apparently do not blindly accept the moral values portrayed in the media. This is very comforting.
  3. “Court rules non-virgin bride, spouse wed”: Here we go again. A Muslim couple went to court a while back in France to divorce over the fact that the wife had lied about being a virgin when they were married, thus violating a condition the marriage was made on. Both husband and wife wanted the divorce so they could get on with their lives, but other people protested, assuming they had a right to determine on what basis other people get married or divorced on. This is what the court in France has done now:
    Overturning an April decision that determined the woman breached the wedding contract by lying about "an essential quality," the court in Douai ruled Monday virginity could not be given such weight because "its absence has no repercussion on matrimonial life," The Guardian reported Tuesday.
    Thus the court is trying to impose on people what they find important in a mate, which is obviously ridiculous, not to mention annulling the annulment is a violation of the wishes of both parties involved. This is a breach of freedom of religion and personal freedom. But given France’s government was nutty enough to think that banning religious clothing from the public schools is a great way to fight terrorists and not a violation of freedom of religion, I may be expecting too much from them.
Today’s news and commentary:In honor of one of today’s quasi-holidays, I would like to note that my current computer is named ’Iyyov (= Job).

Today’s weird thing is “Telescopic Text”. Enjoy and share the weirdness.

Aaron

Tuesday, November 18, 2008

20 Marḥeshwan 5769: Married to a Scorpio Support Day

Greetings.

Worthy causes of the day: “KEEP REFUGE SAFE FOR CONDORS, NOT CATTLE”, “Prevent pollution at Colorado's Little Snake!”, and “Tell the Department of Energy: Prioritize Energy Efficiency!”

Relevant to Divine Misconceptions: “Gays as the new religious bogeymen”: R. Boteach is right. Homosexuality may be religiously prohibited, but fighting against homosexuals having a legal right to marriage does absolutely nothing to bolster heterosexual marriage or make the world a better place.

Today’s news and commentary:Today’s weird thing is “Endor Holocaust”. Enjoy (or be scared over the specifics of what happened when the second Death Star exploded) and share the weirdness.

Aaron

Tuesday, November 4, 2008

6 Marḥeshwan 5769: Election Day (US)/Waiting for the Barbarians Day/Melbourne Cup Day

Greetings.

Worthy cause of the day: “STOP BUSH FROM TAKING A LAST STAB AT ENDANGERED SPECIES”.

Also: If you have not voted yet, please go out and vote now. We need everyone we can get to save the United States from McCain and Palin!

Relevant to Divine Misconceptions:
  1. “French magazine banned after some say it offends Islam”: This is an immature way to handle being offended.
  2. “Op-Ed: Prop 8 goes against God’s love for every person”: This is some of the lamest exegesis I have ever read. The author, Reform pseudo-rabbi David Ellenson, knows very well that Leviticus 18:22 prohibits male homosexuality. To quote:
    Yet I refuse to allow such negative judgments regarding gays and lesbians to go unchallenged from a religious perspective. As Catholic scholar Elizabeth Schussler-Fiorenza has maintained in her powerful book “In Memory of Her: A Feminist Theological Reconstruction of Christian Origins,” the divinity of any passage in Scripture that diminishes the humanity of another—as the one in Leviticus does—surely can be questioned.

    The thrust of one such passage should not override an overarching biblical ethos that teaches us that God loves and affirms the full humanity of each human being.
    Essentially Mr. Ellenson has missed the point of Scripture.  Rather than base his views of YHWH on what the evidence of Scripture has to say and reconsider his views if he finds any inconsistency, he reserves the right to reject any evidence that suggests that he is wrong.  It makes no sense for him to claim he holds by the “biblical ethos” when he takes a view contrary to the Hebrew Bible.  Furthermore, Mr. Ellenson does not even understand what the passage in question is about.  Leviticus 18 consists almost entirely of prohibitions, mostly of a sexual nature, culminating in descriptions of the consequences of abiding or not abiding by these prohibitions.  The whole passage is about behavior.  Nowhere is it claimed that homosexuals are in any way less than human or are unloved by YHWH.  It should also go without saying that desire, which is often not voluntary, is not prohibited at all, so that anyone with homosexual desires—or the desire to do anything else prohibited, for that matter—is not automatically culpable or incapable of being holy.  I would also like to note that Mr. Ellenson misuses the term “fundamentalist”; as noted by Dr. Stephen Prothero in Religious Literacy (pp. 180-181), fundamentalism is a form of Protestant evangelical anti-modernism, and as such the term cannot be legitimately applied to non-Protestants.
  3. “How to fix Orthodox dating”
Today’s news and commentary:Today’s weird thing, suggested by Barry, is Atlantropa. Enjoy and share the weirdness.

Aaron

Tuesday, October 7, 2008

8 Tishri 5769: Ten Days of Repentance/Bathtub Day

Greetings.

Worthy cause of the day:

Relevant to Divine Misconceptions:
  1. “Feds bringing evangelist Alamo back to Arkansas”: This is a story which has been unfolding for a while. Tony Alamo (born Bernie Hoffman), founder of Tony Alamo Christian Ministries, is in trouble with the law for alleged sexual activity with minors. (This seems to have been a problem with insane religious leaders since at least Muḥammad.) It has been repeatedly reported:
    Alamo has said the age of consent to marry is puberty and there's a mandate in the Bible for girls marrying young, but has denied the federal allegations.
    The problem is there is no specific age of consent or mandate for girls to marry young given in the Hebrew Bible or New Testament, so far as I can tell.  I will grant that probably the normal age of marriage was lower than it is today in Western countries, but 1) the contemporary Western world is rather unusual historically and 2) just because something used to be the usual practice does not automatically make it a mandate or the best way to do things. E.g., just because it used to be the usual practice for parents to spank their children does not mean it is the best form of punishment; nonviolent forms of discipline may be just as effective.  If anyone has any data on what Alamo is thinking, please let me know.
  2. “Wall Street’s Collapse Means that Jews Can be Known for Values Rather than Money”: Stereotypes often die hard, and even harder when those stereotyped buy into them.
  3. “Another remarkable archaeological find”: New material from the Second Temple Period!
Today’s news and commentary:Today’s weird thing is Josiah S. Carberry. Enjoy and share the weirdness.

Aaron